Ethos vs Farrell Rose

Side-by-side comparison of two Australian migration agents on the fields that matter most when choosing representation: review volume and rating, MARA registration, specialties, visa subclasses handled, fee structure and location. Updated .

Ethos Migration Lawyers

Melbourne firm practising exclusively in Australian immigration law, employer and individual

4.9705 reviews · google
Visit website ↗

Farrell Rose Migration Lawyers

Merits and judicial review specialists with Melbourne and Sydney offices

Visit website ↗

Side-by-side comparison

FieldEthosFarrell Rose
Founded2015Not published
HeadquartersMelbourneMelbourne
Offices1 location(s)2 location(s)
Practice typeImmigration law firmImmigration law firm
MARNOn enquiry / firm-levelOn enquiry / firm-level
SpecialtiesEmployer sponsorship, Refusal appeals & AAT, Skilled migration, Partner & familyRefusal appeals & AAT, Employer sponsorship, Skilled migration, Partner & family, Student visas
Visa subclasses482, 186, 494, 189, 190, 491100, 186, 189, 190, 309, 482, 485, 491
Aggregated rating4.9
Total reviews7050
Consultation feeOn enquiryOn enquiry
Skilled visa from
Employer-sponsored from
No Visa No FeeNoNo
Payment plansNot advertisedNot advertised

Which one is right for you?

Pick Ethos if

Melbourne firm practising exclusively in Australian immigration law, employer and individual

  • Employers navigating 482, 186 and 494 sponsorship or labour agreements
  • Sponsored workers whose nomination or visa has been refused
  • Applicants needing tribunal proceedings or ministerial intervention
Read the full Ethos review →

Pick Farrell Rose if

Merits and judicial review specialists with Melbourne and Sydney offices

  • Applicants weighing merits review at the ART versus judicial review
  • Federal Circuit Court, Federal Court and High Court migration litigation
  • Visa cancellation and character-related matters
Read the full Farrell Rose review →

See full profiles

Each firm's full profile includes reviews, MARN verification, pricing, FAQ and an independent editorial assessment.